Harvest record/game check rule history:
History: New Rule: Filed September 6, 2007; effective October 11, 2007.
That's when the dcnr decided to change its own mission from the state defined purpose of conservation to "qdm" deer management.
Doe bag limits went from a few per year to two per day, and buck bag limits went from 119/yr to 3 with an antler restriction. The purpose was said to be balancing the buck/doe ratio, adjusting buck age structure and adjusting carrying capacity to fit the habitat.
******************************
That was 16 years ago.
Is it working?
Is its results worth the loss of constitutional government involved and loss of freedom and liberty involved?
Has a state deer biologist ever visited the land where you hunt to evaluate the conditions there?
Is it working?
-
Eddie Maxwell
- 8 Point
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:36 am
- Contact:
-
Tru-Talker
- Beer Dranker....
- Posts: 9273
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:40 am
- Location: Everywhere you're not.......
- Contact:
Re: Is it working?
Pfft...Is this a joke of a question? They aint never left their cozy air conditioned/heated office to check shiit...
Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves...
Confucius
Confucius
-
Walktheline
- 6 Point
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:55 pm
Re: Is it working?
It does not work. The deer are the same size , body weight , and score as they were 10, 20, 30 years ago.
The only thing that’s changed is there are less deer everywhere from mobile to north of Huntsville.
A bag limit can’t change the age structure or trophy potential. It’s stupid to think it can and sounds like some ghey QDMA theory. If a doe makes up half of the genetics there’s no way of knowing if the ones being killed are the ones that were bred by the buck that would always be a 112 inch 5 year old eight point , so no , their theory doesn’t work and it makes about as much biological sense as a football bat.
The only thing that’s changed is there are less deer everywhere from mobile to north of Huntsville.
A bag limit can’t change the age structure or trophy potential. It’s stupid to think it can and sounds like some ghey QDMA theory. If a doe makes up half of the genetics there’s no way of knowing if the ones being killed are the ones that were bred by the buck that would always be a 112 inch 5 year old eight point , so no , their theory doesn’t work and it makes about as much biological sense as a football bat.